
Massachusetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drafted a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.
The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing modernization that is sweeping and it has formally stated its intent to look at online ticket sales, in addition to offering its very own daily dream sports and social video gaming services and products.
Massachusetts is making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for some time, because it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with a more up-to-date and competitive online offering.
While Web casino gaming and poker would demand a huge upheaval that is legislative DFS and social gaming would not ( at least into the Bay State), also it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating its own fantasy sports item as a way attractive to younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of more recent, mobile-friendly styles.
Formal Invite
As such, hawaii has launched a formal request information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, operational support, and maintenance of the Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read an official statement.
This could include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and new lottery games, including but not limited to social video gaming and day-to-day dream recreations choices.’
Of specific interest towards the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, also as guidelines for responsible video gaming controls.
The commission also states it is wrestling with ways of integrating lottery admission retailers so that you can protect the 7,500-odd small enterprises that count on lottery sales commissions.
Homegrown Product
‘We believe the introduction of a fantasy activities platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace an emerging market while continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the Information Service recently.
‘ This type that is particular of would not cannibalize our existing products. It could obviously be a product that is new. It could help us to activate what we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also help Lottery to generate a new revenue source compared to eroding or keeping existing offers.’
Across the edge in New York State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman was railing up against the ‘fraudulent’ nature of the DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared that we now have no federal or state legislation that preclude such sites from running.
Healy has proposed regulation that is full of, drawing up protocols to protect consumers, and has said that state residents who perform DFS should ‘not be concerned’ which they are breaking the law.
After all, there’s nothing wrong with adopting just a little local innovation, and DraftKings, created and bred in Boston, is possibly benefitting from being a homegrown success story.
India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting
Previous India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the nation legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)
Asia is one step closer to legalizing sports betting and gambling following a panel appointed by the country’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the gaming that is longstanding in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.
Home to over 1.2 billion people, India is the second-most populated country in the globe.
Now three lawmakers, former Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized recreations wagering would provide more transparency and cut down on rogue backdoor wagering.
‘It [betting] would provide both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on Monday, adding that the market should be exposed, but only with extensive safeguards in position to ensure that players and those with direct ties to recreations matches are barred from participating.
2013 Scandal
Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as chairman, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.
The events of 2013 were unprecedented though the sport of cricket is no stranger to controversy.
The investigation that is lengthy Delhi Police led to charges against 39 people and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.
The match-fixing that is widespread illegal betting led the BCCI to do something to improve its infrastructure and look for methods to mend its moral standing.
The criminal acts also triggered intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to eradicate unlawful betting systems and precisely monitor players and officials.
BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision
Cricket is probably the most popular activity in India, and while the game’s governing body claims it wants to completely clean its league up, the federal government might not be so eager to ending gambling prohibition.
Apart from horse racing, gambling in India was illegal for nearly 150 years.
In addition to proposing legal cricket wagering, Lodha’s outline additionally shows changing the BCCI’s energy structure and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report up to now.
The choice to authorize gaming and sports betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on their state and levels that are federal.
‘ The government that is federal probably leave it alone as it is still a contentious issue,’ Asia Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.
Gambling has largely been a states’ legal rights topic over the years, but of the nation’s 29 states and seven territories, simply three took actions to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.
Though gambling can provide revenues that are substantial monies for local governments, numerous in Asia believe any expansion of gambling also leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and cash laundering.
Lodha argues gambling’s currently there, albeit illegally, and that swift action must certanly be taken.
‘With big cash and attention, there has not been the necessary caution to protect the sport and its particular players from the orgy of excess,’ he stated.
2nd PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After Very First Effort Fizzled
Ike Haxton, whom resigned on New Year’s as a PokerStars Pro in protest at the changes to the VIP system day. (Image: pokerstars.com)
A second PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently failing to produce a dent that is discernible at least on the webpage’s traffic numbers.
Around 1,600 players signed up for the protest, according to organizers.
Per industry number-cruncher PokerScout.com, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the first day of the attack, it actually rose on January 2nd, when compared with the same day the previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same time the earlier week.
Of course, it’s impossible to learn just how much the dearth that is sudden of stakes players affects PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players who pledged to stay out have in truth proved real to their word.
The boycott, which is due to get rid of Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by several groups WeArePokerPlayers.com that is including and.com, as well as a number of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards an overhaul that is major the VIP system, which took impact on January 1st.
PokerStars announced in November that these changes would consist of scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement of this status being a process that is two-year.
Boycott Backfired?
PokerStars claims that the modifications are designed to improve the poker ecology, nonetheless they club player casino codes leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.
While these players represent some of your website’s avid that is most, long-lasting, and high-ranking players, they are usually net-withdrawing players as opposed to the hordes of net-depositors that the internet poker giant is anxious to attract.
The first boycott took place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that occasion clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic figures remained similar, except that those high-stakes players were replaced with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot rewards.
While PokerStars is probably to have raked less during that duration, it declared itself vindicated by the boycott december.
‘During the three-day boycott we recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem outcomes of the year with steady net gaming revenue, despite the fact that our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they have all year,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.
More Boycotts Planned
The players that are affected undeterred, nonetheless, and are determined showing PokerStars they can make the operator’s life hard.
And more boycotts are planned within the future. WeArePokerPlayers.com has launched a campaign seeking 5,000 signatures to accept at the least a month-long strike, while other protestors have suggested that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by as much as 30 per cent.
On New Year’s Day, Ike Haxton became the second high-profile PokerStars Pro to resign in disgust at the changes, after the exemplory case of Alex Millar, whom severed ties using the site just before the vacation duration.
‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I know what it takes to rake 1M VPP in a ‘ wrote haxton on 2+2 year. ‘It’s a tough grind. For many of the players that do it, it is an all-consuming dedication more intense than most full time jobs.
‘Many of those have relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he included. ‘Finding out, just as you approach the finish line, that your efforts will not be rewarded as you expected them to be is brutal. We cannot in good conscience carry on to endorse a poker web site that treats its players this way.’